The Politics of Difference in Medical Research
University of Chicago Press 2007
With Inclusion, Steven Epstein argues that strategies to achieve diversity in medical research mask deeper problems, ones that might require a different approach and different solutions.
Formal concern with this issue, Epstein shows, is a fairly recent phenomenon. Until the mid-1980s, scientists often studied groups of white, middle-aged men—and assumed that conclusions drawn from studying them would apply to the rest of the population. But struggles involving advocacy groups, experts, and Congress led to reforms that forced researchers to diversify the population from which they drew for clinical research. While the prominence of these inclusive practices has offered hope to traditionally underserved groups, Epstein argues that it has drawn attention away from the tremendous inequalities in health that are rooted not in biology but in society.View Publication >
Welcome to the AMIS Hub!
The story of ‘How do we get patients to stop demanding antibiotics?' to where we are now.
Anti-biosis? – Social and Cultural Inquiries into Human-Microbe...
Two of us from the AMIS Programme Team (Clare Chandler and Komatra Chuengsatiansup) are acting as associate editors for Palgrave...
Markets and Pharmaceuticals: Hardship, Antibiotics, and Markets for...
Northern Thailand (Chiang Rai), 19 March 2018, 7am: The steep mountain road winds through rice fields, small streams, and coffee...