30 May 2018– Clare Chandler –London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
This weekend I had the privilege of engaging with Laura Piddock and Ed Whiting and members of the public at the Hay-on-Wye How The Light Gets In Festival. Angela Saini, health journalist, asked us whether it will be possible to defeat antimicrobial resistance, or whether we should come to terms with our precarious existence.
I liked her question because it points to two central tenets of the current rhetoric around AMR: defeating, a war metaphor; and precarity, a situation where one has limited ability to control one’s life. As an anthropologist, I’m interested how the way we frame a problem affects the solutions that become more obvious and those that become obscured.
In my response, I argued that when we talk of defeating antibiotic resistance, this is as much a fight for the modern paradigms of medicine and economics as it is a fight against superbugs. In my work with colleagues in the Antimicrobials In Society research programme, I have observed that antibiotics are entangled with the way our modern world works. Antibiotics do not only operate as a cure for an illness, they are systematically used to support the productive societies, the bedrock of our current global economic system. To reduce our reliance on antibiotic therefore requires substantial reworking of systems in our modern world, and to do this we need to look beyond the idea of behaviour as individuals’ choices.
People are in precarious situations today which can be linked both to the aspirations and failures of antibiotics. I questioned whether we can address AMR without also revisiting the systems of modern medicine and modern political economy. Ed Whiting also argued for the need for political and regulatory changes to support the reduction of antimicrobial use, rather than expecting this to be addressed at the level of public behaviour change. Laura Piddock argued that ‘overuse’ of antimicrobials is an unhelpful category, and that we need to focus on using these medicines only when lifesaving. We all agreed that despite the future ‘threat’ being hard to quantify, AMR is an issue that needs addressing already today, and this requires not only technological but social and political responses.
Drugs, Bugs and our Precarious Existence
– Clare Chandler – London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
This weekend I had the privilege of engaging with Laura Piddock and Ed Whiting and members of the public at the Hay-on-Wye How The Light Gets In Festival. Angela Saini, health journalist, asked us whether it will be possible to defeat antimicrobial resistance, or whether we should come to terms with our precarious existence.
I liked her question because it points to two central tenets of the current rhetoric around AMR: defeating, a war metaphor; and precarity, a situation where one has limited ability to control one’s life. As an anthropologist, I’m interested how the way we frame a problem affects the solutions that become more obvious and those that become obscured.
In my response, I argued that when we talk of defeating antibiotic resistance, this is as much a fight for the modern paradigms of medicine and economics as it is a fight against superbugs. In my work with colleagues in the Antimicrobials In Society research programme, I have observed that antibiotics are entangled with the way our modern world works. Antibiotics do not only operate as a cure for an illness, they are systematically used to support the productive societies, the bedrock of our current global economic system. To reduce our reliance on antibiotic therefore requires substantial reworking of systems in our modern world, and to do this we need to look beyond the idea of behaviour as individuals’ choices.
People are in precarious situations today which can be linked both to the aspirations and failures of antibiotics. I questioned whether we can address AMR without also revisiting the systems of modern medicine and modern political economy. Ed Whiting also argued for the need for political and regulatory changes to support the reduction of antimicrobial use, rather than expecting this to be addressed at the level of public behaviour change. Laura Piddock argued that ‘overuse’ of antimicrobials is an unhelpful category, and that we need to focus on using these medicines only when lifesaving. We all agreed that despite the future ‘threat’ being hard to quantify, AMR is an issue that needs addressing already today, and this requires not only technological but social and political responses.
Essential Reading
Presenting summaries of, and links to, relevant books and journal articles on the topic of antimicrobials in society.
Life Beside Itself: Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic
Nothing Comes Without Its World: Thinking with Care
When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects
‘There is worse to come’
On the monopoly
Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas
Commentary
Presenting summaries of, and links to, relevant books and journal articles on the topic of antimicrobials in society.
The Third Man: How are we entwined with...
A film event and panel discussion for World Antibiotics Awareness Week 2017
Sustainable aquaculture in Bangladesh
Rather than asking how antibiotics enable livelihoods in situations of increasing precarity, our research asks whether it is possible to...
‘Notes from the Field’: Wakiso District, Kampala, Uganda
Antibiotics, poultry, and livelihoods: Conjoined Worlds in Medium-Scale Urban Livestock Keeping.
Explore our themes
Presenting summaries of, and links to, relevant books and journal articles on the topic of antimicrobials in society.
Care
How do antimicrobials shape care for people, animals and plants?
Knowledge
How do we make AMR Policy?
Pharmaceuticals and Markets
Antimicrobial use is shaped by the contexts within which they are prescribed, sold and traded.
Ecologies
AMR requires us to consider how human life is entangled with microbial life, animal life, plant life, and the environment.